This may be the fatwa the world has been waiting for. It was delivered, not in
a mosque or a madrasah, nor in some dark corner of cyberspace, but in a wood-paneled
hall opposite St. James' Park in London last week. Though issued just across the
street from Britain's Foreign Office, its author, Shaikh Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri,
stressed that neither he nor Minhaj ul-Quran, his Pakistan-based organization, was
supported in any way by any government. His voice and finger often rising sternly,
the sheik delivered a far-reaching diatribe against terrorists and what he described
as their wrongheaded concept of jihad. His fatwa: Terrorism is at all times, in
all conditions, against Islam. The murders terrorists commit will send them, not
to paradise, as often claimed, but to hell. "[Terrorists] are the heroes of hellfire,"
he thundered. Their actions are not just unlawful but render terrorists kufr, or
disbelievers, casting them outside the Islamic faith.
Thousands of clerics have spoken out against terror since 9/11, but Qadri, a
highly respected, Pakistan-born scholar with hundreds of books to his name and millions
of followers everywhere from Syria to Fiji, has issued a fatwa that just might have
traction. Quilliam, the U.K.-based antiextremist think tank, declared it a "highly
significant step towards eradicating Islamist terrorism." The following day, as
TIME was wrapping up an interview with Qadri, President Hamid Karzai's office was
on the phone from Kabul, asking for the rights to translate the fatwa into Dari
and Pushtu. (See pictures of 9/11 from the sky.)
At 600 pages, Qadri's fatwa may well be the most detailed antiterror fatwa ever
written, but it's far from the first. Since 9/11, clerics from Iran's Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to al-Jazeera's televangelist Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi have
condemned terrorism. In 2008, 6,000 Indian Muslim clerics endorsed an antiterror
fatwa. Qadri himself was among the 170 Islamic scholars from various sects who signed
an antiterrorist fatwa in Amman in 2005.
But none of these fatwas has stopped terror. The Amman fatwa was delivered a
day before four British suicide bombers killed 52 people on London transport. Too
often, fatwas lose their force because they're delivered by establishment scholars,
who are seen as protecting the regimes they serve. Fear blunts fatwas, too: last
year, Sarfraz Hussain Naeemi, a prominent Pakistani cleric and an outspoken critic
of Taliban violence, was killed by a suicide bomber soon after he'd issued an antiterror
statement on Pakistani TV. Fearful of retributions, clerics frequently pad their
antiterror fatwas with exceptions, says Qadri, or — more sinisterly — with ambiguous
language. "Many clerics were condemning, but they are scared, so they condemn in
a very soft way, with ifs, and buts," he says. "To save themselves from the terrorists,
they speak in a conditional and doublespeak way." ........(Snip)
The fatwa's blanket nature worries some. "It has intelligent, noble ideas that
I accept and subscribe to totally," says Fuad Nahdi, a British Muslim community-affairs
analyst. "But it doesn't acknowledge the issues on the ground, where people are
frustrated by Western alliances to corrupt governments. Talk to a villager in Pakistan
or Afghanistan, and tell them to petition their government or resort to peaceful
protest, and they'll tell you that the only sign of government they've seen is the
drones dropping bombs on them." (See pictures of Pakistan beneath the surface.)
But it's precisely the swelling support he saw for terrorism in Pakistan that
spurred Qadri to start work on the fatwa four months ago. He'd been writing books
condemning terrorism since 2002, but it wasn't until last year, he says, when Pakistani
public opinion began turning against its own military and against the coalition
forces in Afghanistan that he set to work on a formal religious opinion. Where some
clerics dispense fatwas the way politicians dispense press releases, this is only
the second of 59-year-old Qadri's career. "I don't normally indulge in fatwa matters,"
he told TIME. "Because of my status, people accept them as binding." If that happens
this time then the consequences could be far-reaching.
Fatwa Against Suicide Bombing Standpoint Blogs
ALEXANDER MELEAGROU-HITCHENS
3/3/10
Yesterday, I attended the launch of a fatwa condemning suicide bombings and terrorism.
The document was compiled by Dr Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri, the head of Pakistani based
Sufi organisation, Minhaj ul-Quran. Reproduced below is a short analysis of it which
I co-authored with my colleague Houriya Ahmed for today's Independent.
This is not the first time that such a condemnation has been issued by a senior
Islamic authority. Yet there are two aspects to this one which set it apart from
the rest.
It is an unequivocal denunciation of suicide bombings and terrorism. Dr Qadri
criticises others who condemn acts of terror, while at the same time providing a
catalogue of excuses for it. Addressing the audience at the fatwa launch in Westminster
he said: "A total condemnation should come from the Muslim world without playing
with ifs or buts. No pretext, no foreign policy, no talk of occupation."
Previous condemnations have often referred to terrorism as haram (forbidden).
Dr Qadri takes this a step further by comparing today's terrorists to the 7th century
Kharijites, who were excommunicated because they permitted the killing of anyone
deemed to be an obstacle to 'the rule of God'. Dr Qadri insists that terrorism is
not just a forbidden act, but one that leads to expulsion from Islam: "it is an
act of kufr (disbelief)".
Dr Qadri's message is expressly non-political. He recognises that terrorism feeds
on the politicisation of religion, and he made this clear in his presentation. It
is also important to note that Dr Qadri's fatwa is not the product of his own ijtihad
(interpretation of religious texts); rather he is relaying previous edicts taken
from orthodox and classical Islamic texts - the authenticity of which no Muslim
can dispute.
Minhaj ul-Quran is based in Pakistan, and its decision to launch this fatwa in
the UK was clearly a symbolic one. Britain is the European hub of international
terror, with the majority of British terrorists being of Pakistani descent. This
country sees high levels of extremist traffic—British citizens travel to Pakistan
to strengthen their ideology as well as receive terror training. They then return
to Britain seeking to commit or facilitate acts of terror......(Snip)