This Article was published in
The Frontier Post (August 30, 2010)
By Sahibzada Hussain Mohi-ud-Din Qadri
Pakistan’s otherwise serene political scene has been ignited by the statement
of a leading political party’s chief wherein he asked the ‘patriotic generals’ to
step in for the sake of poor people and bring an end to hereditary and feudalistic
politics. The fact that MQM he heads from the overseas is an important coalition
partner of Pakistan People’s Party, both at the federal and provincial levels, has
added a serious dimension to the debate. This has led both mainstream political
parties i.e. PPP and PML-N to get together in condemnation of the statement and
promote a collective cause for the sake of democracy. Whatever be the intentions
of the MQM chief behind this statement, he has, however, highlighted the serious
deficit so-called democracy suffers from.
The fact that the present version of democracy currently in vogue in the country
cannot make a bit of difference to the lives of millions of people even if allowed
to function for a hundred years cannot be denied. It is true that it is too early
to comment on the efficacy and potential of the system to deliver if seen in the
background of the country’s political history where powerful military kept on holding
the reign of power for more than half of our national life. The argument that democracy
should be given time and space to improve itself also holds water in the light of
our political experience. But the crisis Pakistan and its governance structures
suffer from calls for serious and in-depth introspection on part of all the stakeholders.
It needs to be acknowledged that luxury of time is not available to the political
elite as people have continued to be exploited at the hands of vested interests
for the last 63 years with the result that they have come to the end of their tether
with their frustration and anger ready to burst. As if man-made disasters were not
enough, two successive natural calamities i.e. earthquake of 2005 and massive floods
struck them unawares in a period of five years.
Couple it with the protracted periods of corruption and bad governance and it
becomes a perfect recipe for potential disaster. People have continuously been reminded
of the fact every now and then that state is either unwilling or incapable of coming
to their rescue. More worrisome than these instances of public outcry at the apathy
of the government is the creeping hold of sub-identities over the national identity.
The recent incidents show for yet another time that ethnic, linguistic, provincial,
racial and sectarian narratives have come to characterize the polity. Individuals
and groups are not ready to rise above their parochial interests by conforming to
the mainstream narrative of ‘Pakistaniyat’.
This lack of national integration and unwillingness to subject the sub-national
identities to the mainstream national identity is the mother of all crises facing
Pakistan. What is more, the country’s intelligentsia, political elite and the so-called
establishment who have been running roughshod over the fate of the country do not
seem to realise the potential dangers associated with this phenomenon. They are
busy in their usual political games of power. The unending spate of target killings
in the country’s financial hub, Karachi, has been subjected to a clear ethnic tinge.
Karachi has traditionally been characterized by the turf war between members of
different ethnicities but the way dozens of people were eliminated in a span of
a few days speaks volumes of the penetration of violence in the city. The ongoing
infighting and accompanying riots have rightly been billed as the survival struggle
on part of the warring ethnic groups to ‘preserve their territory’ and save it from
intrusion by others. Couple this with the unfortunate incident of public lynching
of two brothers in Sialkot city of Punjab and you would come to know how powerful
and deep rooted violence narrative has become. One very cogent explanation of why
the phenomenon of terrorism and extremism refuses to go away is the absence of any
alternative ideology. It is primarily a battle of ideas. An idea can be killed and
replaced by a superior idea.
All other steps to stem the onward march of poisonous ideology are merely superficial
in nature and cannot achieve durable results. Those ready to kill and get killed
in the process are fired by the missionary zeal. A comprehensive victory against
the extremist forces can be won after the idea producing such perverted mindsets
is defeated. Unfortunately, the counter-terrorism strategy employed by the government
seems to ignore this important area with emphasis placed on the use of physical
force and economic development. The only way we can deal with these lethal crises
is to revive the ideology of Pakistan as a counterweight to the forces of extremism
and terrorism. Jinnah’s and Iqbal’s conception of a moderate, progressive Islamic
welfare state was overshadowed by the clamour of the rightwing forces for Pakistan
to be a theocratic state.
The official patronage provided to this particular brand of religious zealots
by the former military dictator in the 1980s played havoc with our national identity
and explains why narrative of extremism characterizes Pakistan. This writer strongly
believes that our educational system requires a comprehensive overhauling aimed
at reminding our youth of their real roots. This cannot happen unless the entire
syllabi is carefully sifted and modifications made thereof. Emergence of national
unity and pride on our common heritage can work wonders in the face of heavy odds.
Our political brigade also needs to know that if democracy has to survive as
a system, the politicians need to work it to the benefit of the common man so that
he develops its ownership and is ready to defend it in case of any danger posed
to it. Mere rhetorical allegiance to democracy fails to serves any purpose. This
calls for revision of social contract between the state and its citizens. For long
have the people been suffering at the hands of callous elite. It is about time steps
were taken to correct the historical wrongs. There is no time to waste.